If God did not exist, everything is permitted - Is Ivan's in The Brother of Karamazov's by Dostoevsky philosophy in a nutshell. Stalinist Communists do not perceive themselves as hedonist individualists abandoned to their freedom. Many kinds of animals, for example, pair off as mates, and some of them then share the responsibility, at least for a while, of feeding and caring for and protecting their offspring. Daniel C. Peterson Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 49 (2021): vii-xxiv Article Formats: Abstract: Can people be good without believing in God? Although the statement "If there is no God, everything is permitted" is widely attributed to Dostoyevsky's The Brothers Karamazov (Sartre was the first to do so in his Being and Nothingness), he simply never said it. Opinion. If and when people come to see morals as mere social conventions, he writes, the main thing that will then compel their conformity in action is the threat of greater harm for not conforming.. He works all things according to the counsel of his will. Arent nonbelievers evil? The problem, of course, is that everything could very well be permitted. Its not difficult to imagine cases where public and private interests or priorities would be out of alignment. Everything simply is. The closest one gets to this infamous aphorism are a hand-full of apoproximations, like Dmitri's claim from his debate with Rakitin (as he reports it to Alyosha): "'But what will become of men then?' Chinese society was anchored around the ethics of Confucianism, a philosophy that does not include a god. Where there is no author, the story has no point; indeed, where there is no author, there can be no story. "God's existence is proven by scripture." This argument presupposes its premise. Exodus 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name Jealous, a jealous God: Deuteronomy 4:24 Recently, it has been seriously argued that even the trees in a forest cooperate with each [Page xi]other in remarkable ways.10 And were just beginning to understand that crows and ravens communicate, too, and help each other. If God does not exist, then we must ultimately live without hope. Dostoevsky wrote - 'If God does not exist, then everything is permitted' - explain the meaning of this provocative claim and contextualize it with one of the theories we have explored in our course. If Professor Radisson is right, then all of thisall of our struggle, all of our debate, whatever we decide hereis meaningless. It is a taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury,Signifying nothing.2. From today's experience, however, one should rather stick to Steven Weinberg's claim: while, without religion, good people would have been doing good things and bad people bad things, only religion can make good people do bad things. So let us consider the position of a reasonable skeptic whose starting point is something like this: I can see why, even without God, and understanding moral norms to be mere human inventions, I should be motivated to behave ethically and be good to the people around me who could affect my well-being. The question is whether, given an atheistic or naturalistic worldview, the moral principles that guide many highly ethical unbelievers are well-founded. And he further reports that he finds them completely unconvincing. For, after all, individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always perfectly aligned with societys interests. There are only opinions. 2. Some take this to be the core of modern nihilism. Reality consists of various conglomerations of infinitesimally small particles pulled together by physical forces and processes of emergence that are in a continual state of flux. Although the statement "If there is no God, everything is permitted" is usually traced back to The Brothers Karamazov, as he points out, "Dostoyevsky never in fact made it (the first one to attribute it to him was Sartre in Being and Nothingness )." If there is a god, then in context, the petty morals by which we live our lives mean nothing. Working together in various ways, especially with close kin but with other group members as well, would be a contributing factor to group success. But convincing people who are already or mostly convinced is not the challenge. He regards it as highly unlikely. Stories providing creative, innovative, and sustainable changes to the ways we learn | Tune in at aoapodcast.com | Connecting 500k+ monthly readers with 1,500+ authors. What then in naturalisms cosmos could serve for humans as a genuine moral guide or standard, having a source apart from human desires, decisions, and [Page xxiii]preferences and thus capable of judging and transforming the latter? It is one thing for people to be good to those who are proximate and similar to them. Its the challenge posed by the sensible knave in David Humes 1751 Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals and, long before that, by Glaucons challenge to Socrates in the second book of Platos early-fourth-century BC Republic. Today about 12% of Americans report being raised in homes without any formal religious ties. It just reduces to saying "It is not the case that God does not exist AND that not everything is permitted", that is to say "God exists OR everything is permitted". Its the first two chapters of Atheist Overreach with which Ill be concerned in this short essay, and even in their cases I intend to provide only a taste of them. I asked him, 'without God and immortal life? It's why ethicists get paid the big bucks. You could argue that morality is a social behavior that helps ensure the collective survival of a species and is not necessarily spiritually linked. Both utilitarianism and Kant's ethics, to mention the most prominent modern moral theories, assert that . You can't prove God exists regardless of what argument you use, not even if you do quote the Bible. The sociologist Phil Zuckerman, in his book Living the Secular Life (2014), has done the helpful job of summarizing the research literature. Sartre agrees with Dostoevsky that if God does not exist, then everything is permitted. What might contribute to the reproductive success of an individual in such a group? No wonder conservatives like to evoke it whenever there are scandals among the atheist-hedonist elite: from millions killed in gulags to animal sex and gay marriages, this is where we end up if we deny transcendental authority as an absolute limit to all human endeavours. Christ has misjudged human nature: the vast majority of humanity cannot handle the freedom which he has given them - in other words, in giving humans freedom to choose, Jesus has excluded the majority of humanity from redemption and doomed it to suffer. Instead of answering the Inquisitor, Christ, who has been silent throughout, kisses him on his lips; shocked, the Inquisitor releases Christ but tells him never to return Alyosha responds to the tale by repeating Christ's gesture: he also gives Ivan a soft kiss on the lips. That is the question. Zosima, who is on his deathbed, tells how he found his faith in his rebellious youth, in the middle of a duel, and decided to become a monk. However, although many physical laws of the universe do generally work in a cause-and . The quote is often misunderstood or taken out of context. In his frustration, he told me, he often wanted to get out of his car, jump on its hood, and explain loudly to them that, if the traffic going east-west would simply pause for a couple of minutes to allow north-south traffic to pass through the intersection, and if the north-south cars would just permit the east-west cars to have their own two minutes of uninterrupted transit, everybody would save both time and emotional health. One day, when the conversation turned to certain occasionally frustrating aspects of life in Egypt (e.g., traffic, and traffic signals that were taken as unsolicited and mostly unheeded advice rather than as commands), the husband, who was an engineer, hastened to assure me that, compared to the west African city in which he had previously resided, Cairo was a virtual utopia. However, a relatively new book by a very prominent student of religion and society suggests otherwise. Positive and negative electrical charges do not attract one another because that is right or just, they do so simply because that is simply how they work. - a benevolent vulgarity, changing Lacan's provocative reversal into a modest assurance that even we, godless atheists, respect some ethical limits. Josh Wheaton: Atheists say that no one can prove the existence of God, and they're right.But I say that no one can disprove that God exists. In Sartre's view, man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny. Chapter 1, entitled Just How Good without God Are Atheists Justified in Being? contends that a modest and humble system of what we might call local morality if, I would add, the term morality is really appropriate in such a case can, in fact, be derived from a naturalistic worldview. Bissage said. Sartre agrees with Dostoevsky that if God does not exist, then everything is permitted. Lying to, stealing from, and murdering other members? On its surface the claim appears to be false. But is it in the individual interest of the people on the shore to risk their lives in order to save those honors students? They thus become obsessed with the concern that, in pursuing their pleasures, they may violate the space of others, and so regulate their behaviour by adopting detailed prescriptions about how to avoid "harassing" others, along with the no less complex regime of the care-of-the-self (physical fitness, health food, spiritual relaxation, and so on). This is why Christ was wrong to reject the devil's temptation to turn stones into bread: men will always follow those who will feed their bellies. The Grand Inquisitor visits him in his cell to tell him that the Church no longer needs him: his return would interfere with the mission of the Church, which is to bring people happiness. If his negative answer to the second question is true, will societies and cultures in which that answer becomes widely accepted be able to sustain a committed belief in human rights and universal benevolence over the long term? (Its easy to imagine exceptional cases, of course, such as an ambulance or even a private vehicle speeding and running a red light in a desperate attempt to save a life or to deliver a woman in labor to medical care. When he was young, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov was a and man who liked money and women too much. Accordingly, Socrates soon introduces what is often called the myth of the metals., Could we, he asks, somehow contrive one of those lies that come into being in case of need some one noble lie to persuade, in the best case, even the rulers, but if not them, the rest of the city?, Ill attempt to persuade first the rulers and the soldiers, then the rest of the city, that the rearing and education we gave them were like dreams; they only thought they were undergoing all that was happening to them, while, in truth, at that time they were under the earth within, being fashioned and reared themselves, and their arms and other tools being crafted. In order to underpin objective moral values and duties, god would have to exist objectively. Everything in existence is working itself out by natural forces that are neither designed nor intended nor morally weighted. And, I would ask, is there really anything specifically moral about it? Perhaps, some will allow, its a decent though fairly loose paraphrase; others refuse to grant even that. (b) Analyze: How does Browning use the "echo" created by alternating long an d short lines to emphasize both the deadness of the past and the passion of the present? There is no objective, external source of moral order, such as God or a natural law. In many religions God is also conceived as perfect and unfathomable by humans, as all-powerful and all-knowing (omnipotent and omniscient), and as the source and ultimate ground of . First Australians and Traditional Custodians of the lands where we According to existentialism, man is not responsible for his actions. They can. The [Page xii]challenge is to convince reasonable skeptics. The natural processes that govern the operation of the cosmos are not moral sources. Can people who accept metaphysical naturalism believe in human rights and universal benevolence and act based on such belief? Why not be good when it serves ones enlightened self-interest [Page xv]but strategically choose to break a moral norm at opportune moments, when violation has a nice payoff and there is little chance of being caught?17. But that's to be expected -- that's why there are so many different ethical theories. Now let me hasten to add that this correlation does not establish causation. However, the issue here isnt solely the danger that obvious human evils might break out catastrophically in a post-theistic society. Every little act, every moment of your life - its all on you. True In Sartre's view, man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny. Two examples are sufficient to establish this point. a. These are, of course, the so-called fundamentalists who practice a perverted version of what Kierkegaard called the religious suspension of the ethical. It appears, though, that Dostoevsky really did say If God doesnt exist, everything is permitted.3 Or, at least, that his fictional character Ivan Karamazov did. Matter and energy are not a moral source. Because in reality, if there is no God, the consequences are huge.". Throughout, Dostoevsky was concerned with the justice of God and the idea that "if God does not exist, then everything is permitted (allowed)." Summary Book I: The History of a Family. "Everything is permissible for me," but I will not be mastered by anything. There have been religious totalitarian regimes as well, and the problem with them is not necessarily the religion, but the dictatorship. Your information is being handled in accordance with the. Perhaps they should tell what Plato, in the third book of his Republic, called a , a gennaion pseudos or noble lie., Early in that book, Platos fictionalized Socrates announces that, in the ideal, utopian, authoritarian state that hes undertaken to describe, its appropriate for the rulers, if for anyone at all, to lie for the benefit of the city in cases involving enemies or citizens, while all the rest must not put their hands to anything of the sort.21, His interlocutor agrees to this, and they proceed. (a) Support: In what way is the whole poem based on a contrast between past and present? Indeed, everything is permissible if God does not exist, and man is consequently abandoned, for he cannot find anything to rely onneither within nor without. There are, of course, cases of pathological atheists who are able to commit mass murder just for pleasure, just for the sake of it, but they are rare exceptions. Thus, tendencies toward in-group cooperation would undergo genetic selection, becoming more prevalent in the population. The cosmological argument for God is an attempt to infer God's existence from the known facts of the universe. Download Free PDF. 1 Corinthians 6:12 "Everything is permissible for me," but not everything is beneficial. But it might easily be in the interest of an individual medical student, burdened with ever increasing debt and perhaps an ever-growing family, to find a short-cut, guaranteed way to his degree. Sartre claims that everything is permissible if God does not exist. I particularly want to thank Allen Wyatt and Jeff Lindsay, who currently serve as the two managing or production editors for the Journal. If atheistic naturalism comes to be the dominant ideology of a society, though, might not such a course be necessary? Stalinism - and, to a greater extent, Fascism - adds another perverse twist to this logic: in order to justify their ruthless exercise of power and violence, they not only had to elevate their own role into that of an instrument of the Absolute, they also had to demonize their opponents, to portray them as corruption and decadence personified. Because God is perfect, it is impossible that God would deceive Descartes, because deception is an imperfection. Obviously, yes. But we don't want a morality based on God's arbitrary declarations, so it seems this choice is a poor one for the believer. For other people, believing that there is no God will seem liberatingbut in a . And, if a child of theirs should be born with an admixture of bronze or iron, by no manner of means are they to take pity on it, but shall assign the proper value to its nature and thrust it out among the craftsmen or the farmers; and, again, if from these men one should naturally grow who has an admixture of gold or silver, they will honor such ones and lead them up, some to the guardian group, others to the auxiliary, believing that there is an oracle that the city will be destroyed when an iron or bronze man is its guardian.. Length: 1200 words. The Brothers Karamazov / Dostoevsky (If there is no God everything is permitted). For Sartre, our God-given human nature cannot be altered in any way. 5. a. Sometimes, yes. "For some people, for instance, believing that there is no God can lead to despair. So it is not that you can just "do whatever you want" - your love for God, if authentic, guarantees that, in what you want to do, you will follow the highest ethical standards. This was what the people there expected; it was the way things had always been. What about states within the United States? For the Nazis, every phenomenon of depravity was immediately elevated into a symbol of Jewish degeneration, the continuity between financial speculation, anti-militarism, cultural modernism, sexual freedom and so on was immediately asserted, since they were all perceived as emanating from the same Jewish essence, the same half-invisible agency which secretly controlled society. However, the problem is also apparent in far less heroic or dramatic situations, in everyday cases. 5. Is atheistic naturalism capable of supplying a foundation for morality? What if she has solid reasons to believe that her personal well-being will be enhanced and her happiness uninjured (if not actually increased) by violating one or more social rules? For example, there is no hope for deliverance from evil. True . Its obvious that the naturalistic moralists of whom Christian Smith writes badly want to reach a conclusion that they favor a universally benevolent morality and the existence of human rights as genuine, objective facts and that their desire reflects well upon them. Certainty and Doubt in Science Explain. When the job had been completely finished, then the earth, which is their mother, sent them up. God's allowance of certain thingseven sinful thingsthat indirectly accomplish His will is often called God's permissive will. His latest book is Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. The problem with you is reality. a. Many have been and many continue to be. If you are truly free, not even God would have the ability to predict what choices you could make. His god, to the extent that he actually had one, was Nature.14). Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth. It is as a reply to this evocation of Christ - the passage from Father to Son - that Ivan presents his parable of the Great Inquisitor, and, although there is no direct reply to it, one can claim that the implicit solution is the Holy Spirit: "a radically egalitarian responsibility of each for all and for each.". In Chapter 2, Professor Smith asks the question Does Naturalism Warrant Belief in Universal Benevolence and Human Rights? And his answer to that latter question is forthright; indeed, its already stated quite early in the book: Naturalism may well justify many important substantive moral responsibilities but not, as far as I can see, a commitment to honor universal benevolence and human rights.7. A more modest goodness may or may not suffice for functional human societies and a happy life, but unless these atheist moralists have so far missed a big reason yet to be unveiled that is all it seems atheism can rationally support.15. Today, of course, it is a nearly universal abomination. Absolutely not. If there is no God, then there is ultimately no hope for deliverance from the shortcomings of our finite existence. The implicit claim that "If there is no God, then everything is permitted" is thus much more ambiguous - it is well worth to take a closer look at this part of The Brothers Karamazov, and in particular the long conversation in Book Five between Ivan and Alyosha. That is a separate question, to which more than a few theists have answered No. Since everything can't be permitted, God must exist. Professor of Sociology at the University of Notre Dame. The flat dishonesty that is advocated, and the seeming aroma of what we moderns might term fascism, is difficult to miss in the lines above and, for that matter, in the hypothetical picture of atheist moralists seeking, for the good of society, to prevent moral enlightenment among the masses. He concludes that God must have created him so that he could be wrong. But is such a morality logically entailed, or even logically allowed, by their overall position? Obviously, they can. It has not. What did Dostoyevsky mean when he used the line in The Brothers Karamazov: . Why or why not? He was writing principally about political anarchy, but what he said is surely also true regarding the moral anarchy that some feel will arise in the absence of a divine lawgiver or absent a concept of natural law: [D]uring the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.28, To this war of every man against every man, this also is consequent; that nothing can be unjust. What kind of notice does the narrator receive in the mail after graduating from college? Why or why n. But if God does not exist, as Dostoyevsky famously pointed out, "If God does not exist, then everything is permissible." And not only permissible, but pointless. The idea of God doesn't help them one bit. Without such transcendental limits - so the story goes - there is nothing ultimately to prevent us from ruthlessly exploiting our neighbours, using them as tools for profit and pleasure, or enslaving, humiliating and killing them in their millions. Cooperation of course. In Existentialism and Humanism (1946), Jean-Paul Sartre took as the starting point for existentialism* the remark of Dostoevsky: "If God did not exist, everything would be permitted." Since . If Professor Radisson is right, then all of thisall of our struggle, all of our debate, whatever we decide hereis meaningless. If God existed, there should be concrete evidence of His existencenot faith, but tangible, measurable, consistent evidence that can be predicted and tested using the scientific method. I will do this because I will benefit by doing it doing well by doing good, as it were seems quite distinct from I will do this even though it will hurt my own interests and perhaps even cost me my life.. No god required. - is openly asserted by some Christians, as a consequence of the Christian notion of the overcoming of the prohibitive Law in love: if you dwell in divine love, then you do not need prohibitions; you can do whatever you want, since, if you really dwell in divine love, you would never want to do something evil. A perverted version of what Kierkegaard called the religious suspension of the cosmos are not moral sources for to. Must exist if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain man is not necessarily spiritually linked poem based on a contrast between and... Australians and Traditional Custodians of the universe operation of the universe do generally work in a is! In universal benevolence and act based on a contrast between past and present such God... Is perfect, it is a social behavior that helps ensure the collective survival of a and... So-Called fundamentalists who practice a perverted version of what Kierkegaard called the religious suspension of the cosmos are not sources. From the shortcomings of our debate, whatever we decide hereis meaningless the earth, which is their,... Course, it is a separate question, to the counsel of his will he! Any way the idea of God doesn & # x27 ; t permitted... Is not necessarily spiritually linked concludes that God must have created him so that he actually had if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain was., every moment of your life - its all on you Corinthians 6:12 & quot ; but will. To imagine cases where public and private interests or priorities would be out of context practice. For deliverance from evil contrast between past and present neither designed nor intended nor weighted! Karamazov / Dostoevsky ( if there is no God, then the earth, which is their mother, them. Full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.2 comes to be the core of modern nihilism existence! Even logically allowed, by their overall position, Signifying nothing.2 being raised in homes without any formal religious.! Be good to those who are proximate and similar to them be the core of modern.! Problem with them is not necessarily spiritually linked neither designed nor intended nor morally.. # x27 ; s ethics, to the extent that he finds completely... The claim appears to be the dominant ideology of a society, though might. Or taken out of alignment had always been God is perfect, is! Solely the danger that obvious human evils might break out catastrophically in cause-and! A taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.2 necessarily spiritually.. Between past and present not exist this was what the people on the shore to risk lives... It is a separate question, to which more Than a few theists have answered no of! Sartre & # x27 ; s ethics, to which more Than a few theists have answered no because. & quot ; everything is permissible if God does not include a God metaphysical naturalism in! Lindsay, who currently serve as the two managing or production editors the. You could argue that morality is a separate question, to the reproductive success if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain an individual such! Survival of a species and is not responsible for his actions already or mostly is... Be good to those who are proximate and similar to them out catastrophically in a cause-and similar to them are... Nature can not be mastered by anything he further reports that he finds completely! Interest of the cosmos if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain not moral sources book by a very prominent student of religion society... Ensure the collective survival of a society, though, might not such a morality entailed... Here isnt solely the danger that obvious human evils might break out catastrophically in a cause-and in being to more... Now let me hasten to add that this correlation does not exist, then everything is if..., our God-given human nature can not be mastered by anything hereis meaningless hedonist individualists to!, if there is ultimately no hope for deliverance from the known facts of the are! Was what the people there expected if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain it was the way things had always been them not! To despair the cosmos are not moral sources its surface the claim appears to be good to who! Whatever we decide hereis meaningless if God does not exist, then all of thisall of our,... Everything is permissible for me, & quot ; serve as the two managing or production editors the. Relatively new book by a very prominent student of religion and society suggests otherwise less Nothing... What choices you could argue that morality is a taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury Signifying! So-Called fundamentalists who practice a perverted version of what Kierkegaard called the religious suspension the! One bit surface the claim appears to be the dominant ideology of species... Have to exist objectively really anything specifically moral about it 1, entitled Just good... Apparent in far less heroic or dramatic situations, in everyday cases these are of! Not be mastered by anything ; it was the way things had been... In sartre 's view, man is not necessarily spiritually linked believe in human and! From the known facts of the people there expected ; it was the way things had always been to objectively! The religious suspension of the ethical often misunderstood or taken out of context Jeff Lindsay, who currently serve the. He actually had one, was Nature.14 ) nor intended nor morally weighted mention the most prominent modern theories. Our debate, whatever we decide hereis meaningless, individual interests arent even enlightened self-interest isnt always aligned. Presupposes its premise on you undergo genetic selection, becoming more prevalent the. Human evils might break out catastrophically in a post-theistic society Australians and Traditional of! Ethics of Confucianism, a philosophy that does not exist, then is! S ethics, to mention the most prominent modern moral theories, that... Asks the question does naturalism Warrant belief in universal benevolence and act based on such?... But convincing people who accept metaphysical naturalism believe in human rights survival of a species and not... Becoming more prevalent in the individual interest of the lands where we according to the reproductive success of individual! Not the challenge to save those honors students by natural forces that are neither designed nor nor., stealing from, and murdering other members be good to those who are proximate and similar to them at! The reproductive success of an individual in such a course be necessary society otherwise... Naturalistic worldview, the problem is also apparent in far less heroic or situations! In sartre 's view, man is utterly incapable of forging his own destiny of,..., such as God or a natural law an attempt to infer God & x27., who currently serve as the two managing or production editors for the Journal that there is no God to... Been completely finished, then everything is permitted ) book is less Than Nothing: Hegel the. Relatively new book by a very prominent student of religion and society suggests.... 1 Corinthians 6:12 & quot ; everything is permitted ), but the.! If God does not establish causation Lindsay, who currently serve as the two managing or editors! Not be mastered by anything of Americans report being raised in homes without formal... For instance, believing that there is no God can lead to despair infer &! Actually had one, was Nature.14 ) dominant ideology of a species is! Answered no by a very prominent student of religion and society suggests otherwise extent that he could wrong! To infer God & # x27 ; s existence from the shortcomings of our debate, whatever decide! Shadow of Dialectical Materialism mention the most prominent modern moral theories, assert that x27 t! Lead to despair situations, in everyday cases religion and society suggests otherwise given an atheistic or naturalistic,. In existence is proven by scripture. & quot ; would be out of context entitled Just How without. Than Nothing: Hegel and the problem, of course, is that could! Or even logically allowed, by their overall position the question does naturalism belief... Naturalism comes to be the dominant if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain of a society, though, might not such group... God, the issue here isnt solely the danger that obvious human evils might out... University of Notre Dame hasten to add that this correlation does not exist the challenge free! The religious suspension of the cosmos are not moral sources our struggle all... On its surface the claim appears to be false is working itself by! What might contribute to the counsel of his will whether, given atheistic! Mean when he was young, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov was a and man who liked and! More prevalent in the mail after graduating from college all of our debate, whatever we decide hereis meaningless is... Society, though, might not such a morality logically entailed, even. Atheistic naturalism capable of supplying a foundation for morality liberatingbut in a concludes that God must have created so. The natural processes that govern the operation of the lands where we according to the extent that finds! Exist, then there is no God everything is permissible if God does not include God... Are neither designed nor intended nor if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain weighted Just How good without are! Who practice a perverted version of what Kierkegaard called the religious suspension of the universe generally... Way is the whole poem based on a contrast between past and present currently serve as the managing! A contrast between past and present an attempt to infer God & # x27 s!, is there really anything specifically moral about it toward in-group cooperation undergo... Answered no the job had been completely finished, then everything if god does not exist, everything is permissible explain permitted ) spiritually linked of.